Why Women Should Not be Allowed in Active Combat Duty Essay

Why Women Should Not be Allowed in Active armed combat Duty - Essay ExampleThey atomic number 18 admirable in the way they acquit themselves in multiplication of conflict and split second decision making and maybe, on the dot maybe -- we might even agree a female president some day. Women still ingest lofty ambitions when it comes to more things that they hope to do in terms of male equality and, along with the presidency, fighting alongside men in energetic combat is still one glass ceiling they cannot break. Although there already exists cracks in that particular ceiling, I do not believe that women should ever be allowed to see active combat for a numeral of valid reasons. There atomic number 18 two main reasons that women should not be allowed in combat harmonise to Robert Bork (qtd. in Sowin). Those reasons atomic number 18 1. Putting women in combat is crucial to womens self-esteem and to mens respect for women. (That has never been uncoiled in the past and it is i mpossible to see why it should be true now.) 2. Combat roles are important to military advancement. The above arguments are all based upon the way that women are traditionally viewed in our society. Womens rights activists protest the idealization of the female role in society because it makes them seem homogeneous fragile, emotionally weak people who do not have any desire or strength to defend themselves or others. By joining the military and joining active combat, women feel that they are an evenly strong sex and are capable of fighting the good fight also. This is one case wherein the intentions may be sound, but the execution will always be weak. The reality of women in the military is that they are given preference and leeway in most streneous and taxing activities because women do not have the comparable stamina as men. In fact, women who train in West Point and other military institutions are not made to compete against other men or by male standards, they are whole mea sured in terms of capabilty against other women. This can prove to be detrimental on the subject field where they fight alongside men who are faster and stronger but are then held back in order to allow the women to catch up. (Sowin Why Women Should Not Be Allowed in Combat). Gender norming and lowering the prepare standards in order to allow women to pass is a disservice to our world class soldiers who are anticipate to lead on the battlefield. Women are still thought of all over the world, most specially in the Muslim territories as being weak and dependent on the male species. Majority of the modern women have managed to change that idea by proving that they can be emotionally and physically strong in respective(a) ways. I take my hats off to those women. However, fighting in an active battlefront requires much more than just marathon training and endurance tests. There are those who take on the point of view that Women are not suited by temperament or by physical characteri stics for the highly aggressive, ultra-violent pursuit of conquest in battle. Much of an armys success depends upon intimidation of the enemy. A force composed of women is outlying(prenominal) less intimidating than one consisting of macho men. Intimidation of the enemy saves lives in wartime. (Women Should Not Be Allowed in Military Combat). Consider if you will, that the enemies of our nation field burly, scary, and brainwashed men into battle. They live to intimidate the weak. The simple flash of of their eyes, flare of the nostrils, or clearing of the throat is designed to instill fear into any enemy be he male or female. Fighting a war does not allow for segregation of the sexes in order to effectively fight the battle. It is man vs. woman in most cases and, no matter what Hollywood says about G.I. Jane, a woman can easily be taken down by a well trained and strength enhanced enemy. This will then pose a problem for the aggroup who will