The Myth of Conflict Between Science and Religion Essay

The fiction of Conflict Between Science and Religion - Essay ExampleConflict seems to be the around ordinary interaction between religion and experience. The two seem to conflict on nearly everything including conclusions such as the origin of man, the origin of diseases, and heliocentric solar system, as well as on how they arrive at their respective conclusions (Brooke and meter, 2011). Their conflict seem to emanate from what they rely on for their respective beliefs religion relies on sureness of supernatural being and truth that is supposed to be eternal and universal, while science relies on liberty whose source is reasoning and evidence that are subject to challenge. It is this nature of conflict that informs the assertion by Ronald Numbers that the greatest myth in the history of religion and science holds that they have been in a eternal conflict state (Numbers, 2009). There has been a raging debate regarding this assertion, with some agreeing with it, while others di sagreeing. This essay allow discuss how the history of religion and science has been in a state of constant conflict as argued by Ronald Numbers. The argument leave behind be supported through a discussion of northward, Einstein, and Darwin. The brilliant unravel of Isaac nitrogen in the seventeenth century gave rise to issues that strained the relationship between religion and science at that time and in subsequent years (Harrison, 2010). northwards arguments have been used by many scientists in their plays and have been some of the greatest causes of the conflict between science and religion. Newton modeled the heavenly bodies (the sun, earth, and moon) behavior through means that are largely mechanical by observation that the force of gravity was the only force responsible for ter peace of mindrial phenomena (Newton, 1953). His model postulated that terrestrial phenomena like the falling of heavy bodies to earth and celestial phenomena like the orbit of the earth around t he sun was as a result of the force of gravity. He brilliantly combined his observation with mathematical model to formulate triad famous motion laws that a force of strength applied to a mass body leads to acceleration that every action is paired with an opposite and equal reaction and that a body at rest will always stay at rest, while a body in motion will keep being in uniform motion, unless an external force acts on it (Newton, 1953). The powerful and comprehensive work of Newton signifi rousetly contributed to the field of science as his principles account for a number of natural phenomena. Although he frequently argued that in the absence of a materially-mediated force, God might be directly responsible for gravitational force, he never categorically stated that the system of nature required God (Brooke and Numbers, 2011). His success and proceed success in the field of success is viewed by many scientists as an argument for atheism. According to most of them, no one has a ny reason to believe that God exists, if God is not needed to rationalise the worlds behavior since mechanical and scientific principles can. However, religious arguments conflicts the science arguments as postulated by Newton (Morris, 1974). Contrary to Newtons arguments, religion holds that God exists and he is the force behind everything including the terrestrial and celestial phenomena. Also, religion is of the view that the behavior of the world in the past and in present times can only be understood by inferring to a Supreme Being and not science. Besides, religion conflicts Newtons arguments by arguing that the worlds complexity spoke in favor of the population of God