Interpretation of Spss Outcomes Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Interpretation of Spss Outcomes - Essay Exampletions atomic number 18 chiefly normal distributed Normal Skewness confronts that the participants distribution on the social influence questions were evenly distributed indicating a values slightly resembling the mean. This shows that the participants were equally statistically significant in determining the outcome.Performance anticipation questions atomic number 18 generally left skewed Left Skewness shows that the participants distribution on the performance expectancy questions was cast out indicating a value lower than the mean. This shows that the participants were not statistically significant in determining the outcome.Effort expectancy questions are mainly left skewed Left Skewness shows that the participants distribution on the intention questions was controvert indicating a value lower than the mean. This shows that the participants were not statistically significant in determining the outcome. However, while more or less responses showed right and normal skewness, left skewness appeared more frequently.Facilitating questions are mainly left skewed, with a elegant tendency to normal distribution for the last facilitating chart. Left skewness indicates that the participants distribution on the intention questions was mainly negative indicating a value lower than the mean. However, a slight tendency to the normal distribution shows that participants were fairly statistically significant.Perceived security risk answers are mainly normal distributed Normal Skewed questions show that the participants distribution on the intention questions normal with almost even distribution and indicates a value tight tied to the mean. This shows that the participants were not statistically significant in determining the outcome.Perceived trust answers are mainly normal distributed, with a slight tendency to left skewness for the first chart Considering the first chart, it is observe that the perceived question distribution is left skewed indicating that participants with opposing opinions